The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Mats Eriksson

Mats Eriksson

Professor

Mats Eriksson

Reassessment of Archaeooides based on new material from the Fortunian (early Cambrian) of China infers algal affinity

Author

  • Xiaofeng Xian
  • Mats E. Eriksson
  • Huaqiao Zhang

Summary, in English

Archaeooides originally refers to a group of early Cambrian globular microfossils with regularly arranged nodular surface ornaments, and of a diameter ranging from less than 400 μm to more than 2 mm. The traditional taxonomy assigns all Archaeooides-like microfossils to a single morphotaxon, Archaeooides granulatus, irrespective of their differences in size and surface ornamentation. Archaeooides has been interpreted as a possible diapause embryo because of its inferred palintomical cell division and thick wall with vesicular structures. However, this interpretation needs further testing based on an updated taxonomy and differentiation of taphonomic artifacts from biological structures. Here, we report new, three-dimensionally phosphatized, Archaeooides-like microfossils from the Fortunian of China. In addition to A. granulatus with nodular ornaments, we recognized three new taxa, i.e., Shaanisphaera spinosa gen. et sp. nov. with spine-like ornaments, Qinlingisphaera conica gen. et sp. nov. with cone-like ornaments, and Dahisphaera plana gen. et sp. nov. with oblate ornaments. Each taxon has a wide size interval, ranging continuously from several hundred micrometers to one or two millimeters, which is different from animal eggs that generally have a narrow and conservative size interval. Micro-CT analyses and thin sections reveal that the vesicular structures may be taphonomic in nature, and that the wall thickness is specimen-dependent. Collectively, the evidence at hand does not support an embryo interpretation for Archaeooides. Instead, the wide size interval probably represents ontogenetic variations that are common in many fossil and modern algae, and thus further suggests an algal affinity for Archaeooides as well as the other Archaeooides-like microfossils.

Department/s

  • Lithosphere and Biosphere Science

Publishing year

2024-03-01

Language

English

Publication/Series

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

Volume

637

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Geology

Keywords

  • Archaeooides
  • Early Cambrian
  • Fossil embryo
  • Kuanchuanpu Formation
  • Xinli section
  • Zhangjiagou section

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0031-0182